“The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point, however, is to change it”- Karl Marx

So last night, after much talk and scrutiny, we had the Question Time with Mr Nick Griffin himself. What a palaver this has been, eh? And to be honest, it was quite a shambles. It was always going to be "The Nick Griffin Show" but the extend to which this was true last night, was shocking.


Firstly, the structure of the debate put Mr Griffin at the centre. Every question, even those not directly aimed at Griffin, revolved around his opinions or the other panelists criticising him left right and centre, and the usually fair and composed David Dimbleby seemed to slightly out of control. The central issue of the debate also came down to be Immigration, which is the BNP's biggest selling point policy, and gave him room to point his finger at the "political elite" for failing the common British citizen. Griffin was made out to be a lying little toad with bigotry boiling very close to his slimy exterior, BUT the debate was revolved around him, and because his appearance on Question Time was justified by the BBC on the grounds of Electoral fairness, I felt it was unfair and contradictory to base the debate on his views.

Secondly, the other panelists did little to scrutinise Griffin's stance. The representatives from the main 3 political parties looked ridiculous as they stumbled over one another to get one-up on Griffin, to make their party seem the only party to be standing up to the BNP; but instead they came across as point-scoring bafoons. And this AGAIN, gives the BNP room to point their finger at the "political elite", and portray themselves as the outsiders in politics, and the only party on the side of the people- not the fatcat mainstream politicians. Bonnie Greer was the only panelist who was a real opposition to Griffin, as she proved that the fundamental constitution of the BNP is based on factually incorrect information, and their history that they spout on the website is fundamentally wrong and warped. I think Greer's appearance on the show made a good point- its not the mainstream politicians who are going to be the ones crushing the BNP, but the people outside of the political system- not careerist politicians, but normal people on the street who are repulsed by Griffin's view for Britain.

The show in all honesty was a farce. The show was treated as a "BNP-special" not a normal debate with a variety of politicians on a series of issues, and this glorified Griffin and allowed him to steer the show to his own conclusions. As French-fascist and MEP Le Pen has said today, this appearance on BBC will do wonders for the BNP; YES- he was made to look like a twat, but this is the start of the BNP slowly coming into the mainstream, and into the wider public consciousness, and from last nights evidence the mainstream politicians are not going to act as a strong, hard united-front against the BNP, and it will take people like Bonnie Greer and the people protesting outside the BBC buildings, to really put an end to the ascent of the BNP.

Continue..

Filed Under:


To have the threat of the BNP, we now have the English Defence League (EDL) to worry about. Now that the BNP have gone mainstream- suits, appearances on flagship BBC shows; the EDL have filled the violent, thuggish hole that the BNP have left. For those who don't know much about the EDL, let me fill you in a little bit. "United Peoples of Luton", formed in response to a March 2009 Islamist protest organized by the extremist group Al-Muhajiroun and including members of Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaah against Royal Anglian Regiment troops returning from Afghanistan. The League states that it opposes only "jihadists", rather than Muslims as people, although members were reported to have chanted "We hate Muslims" at pro-Palestinian demonstrators at counter-demonstrations in London on 13 September 2009. So there is a brief outline of how we got the EDL in our lives.

So the EDL claim to be "anti-Jihadists" rather than Muslim people. But this is such a transparent facade which meagerly trys to mask the underlying racism that fuels the EDL. Recent demonstrations by the EDL up and down the country, have all ended with cases of racial assault, and destruction of Muslim owned shops. So this rubbish about being anti-Jihadist not anti-Muslim, is a load of old bolderdash, and is being used to cover the EDL's real violent aims. They make all these claims about making "our streets safer", but do they say how this would be done? No. From previous experience and interaction with members of the EDL, it would seem that their solution is to ban Islam from the UK, and destroy all Mosques. Aha, yes EDL, this is a a very peaceful movement isn't it?

Obviously, dealing with Jihadism is a very difficult thing within the UK, but just because there have been terrorists attacks from Muslim-affliated groups, doesn't mean we should attack Islam itself. The majority of the UK Muslim population are peaceful people who wish to carry out their lives and religion in peace, and the number of Muslims in favour of Islamification are very small, or even none. In my opinion, I don't think this is even an issue that us non-Muslims really have a great deal of say in. The Muslim community and the Muslim Council of Britain are engaged in the fight to stop young Muslims being goaded into extremism and it is for them to alleviate problems in their community, and it is our job as the non-Muslim population to support them on their cause in whatever way the Muslim Council see fit. We should engage with this community, rather than pushing them away and branding them all "Jihadist", which ultimately is a self-fulfilling prophecy.



Continue..

Filed Under:


I have previously talked about the need to engage in debate with the BNP rather than casting them out and providing them with ammunition to claim they are the party on the side of the people. I still hold this belief, but the last couple of days have been quite telling on the issue (see here http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/oct/11/bbc-bnp-ashley-cole-comment-row). Engaging in debate with the BNP is important, yes, but alas, it must be critical and questioning, and not just roll over like the BBC has. It must be met with harsh criticism and a strong case made for opposition; freedom of speech is important but when statements of this nature are made, freedom of speech must still exist but it should be harshly scrutinized. The BBC has failed on this respect, and this makes me worry about how the Question Time appearance of Nick Griffin will be portrayed. The BBC as a publicly funded institution has certain commitments to its paying public, and to allow the BNP to spout violent hate without opposition is doing a huge injustice to its paying public. The BBC should either not engage with their debate at all, or engage in the debate full-heartedly and involve people from not just the mainstream political streams in the debate, to get a real scrutiny of these racist bigots.

Continue..

Filed Under:


"The world is like a ride in an amusement park. And when you choose to go on it, you think it's real because that's how powerful our minds are. And the ride goes up and down and round and round. It has thrills and chills and it's very brightly coloured and it's very loud and it's fun, for a while. Some people have been on the ride for a long time and they begin to question, is this real, or is this just a ride? And other people have remembered, and they come back to us, they say, "hey - don't worry, don't be afraid, ever, because, this is just a ride..."
And we... kill those people.
Ha ha
"Shut him up."
"We have a lot invested in this ride. Shut him up. Look at my furrows of worry. Look at my big bank account and my family. This just has to be real."
Just a ride. But we always kill those good guys who try and tell us that, you ever notice that? And let the demons run amok. But it doesn't matter because: It's just a ride. And we can change it anytime we want. It's only a choice. No effort, no work, no job, no savings and money. A choice, right now, between fear and love. The eyes of fear want you to put bigger locks on your doors, buy guns, close yourself off. The eyes of love, instead, see all of us as one. Here's what we can do to change the world, right now, to a better ride. Take all that money that we spend on weapons and defences each year and instead spend it feeding and clothing and educating the poor of the world, which it would many times over, not one human being excluded, and we could explore space, together, both inner and outer, forever, in peace.- Bill Hicks

Continue..

Filed Under:


So the last couple of weeks we have been enjoying the extremely boring coverage of the 3 main political parties' conferences. I have tried to delve into some of the coverage, but I abandoned these attempts for my own mental health. I now fear greatly what is going to happen at the next election, truely fear, as the only truly electable parties (due to the hugely unjust, unfair voting system of first-past-the-post) are truely missing the point of what is happening in Britain today, and the BNP are filling that void- which has even worse repercussions for Britain than Gordon holding on for a few more years (despite what some of the right-wing press will have you think).


Firstly, Britain needs new industry. Thatcher completely ravaged and destroyed Britains industry during the 1980s as she feared the power of the Unions. She stripped whole regions of their one source of income and employment, and then blamed them for being unemployed. By destroying Britains industry, and funding it in the financial industry (which surprise surprise happens to be based in the South, providing jobs for well off Southerners, not unemployed Northerners) she took away Britain's recovery tool for when the financial industry goes to shit. You could say 'she wouldn't have know this was going to happen', but she had a hell of a lot of neo-liberal economists, who must have understood that capitalism is designed to collapse, and the financial industry is the most precarious of all industry. Not to mention, that the Pound has been in a 50 year decline, so by putting all Britain's eggs in the financial market was ultimately destined to fail, as no one is going to want to buy a decreasing in value currency. SO- here we are in 2009, when the financial industry has gone to pot, and we have no means of other trade to get Britain trading again. And here comes my longwinded point- Britain needs to invest in new industry to, 1. provide jobs. 2. provide Britain with something to trade, that isn't just financial capital. So what the next government needs to do is to create a new Green industry. By investing in Green companies and setting up Green schemes such as building carbon-efficient housing and producing environmentally friendly products, Britain can become a leader in Green products, and make more jobs for people around the country.

The banks and big corporation's based in the UK must also be reigned in massively. We can't have the state of our economy put in the hands of money-hungry yuppies. By investing more in Green industry we will take the risk element of our economy away. Huge regulation has also got to come in to stop the banks lending money between each other, and learn that a bank is a bank- it is there in the interests of those who put money in their accounts- not the boardmembers. And a more general point, these companies should be radically restructured, so the few at the top don't benefit from the companies profits more than the people at the bottom to eradicate this vulgar bonus-culture. By enforcing a more cooperative element to these companies will stamp a responsibility into them, and huge risks will not be taken. We must put the economy in the hands of the people producing our tradable goods and people doing good in communities, not some careerist banker. And by creating collective and egalitarian element to businesses they can be transformed into Green companies with low carbon-emissions; whereas at the moment these businesses are not going to become Greener as they are run by the elite at the top who will only change in the name of profit, so the change must come from below. Becoming Green should also come with benefits, and a Green credit scheme should be considered.

By creating new industry we will create more jobs, obviously. And this will quell the problems in communities that are leading to the rise of the BNP. Many BNP voters buy into the view that foreign-migrants are taking their jobs away from them, and a lot of BNP voters do not support this racial crusade that Griffin and the rest of the Gestapo are pushing- the majority just fear for their jobs, and quite rightly. But they are pointing the finger of blame at the wrong people. It is not the migrant workers coming to the UK that is creating this unemployment, as the migrants filled the jobs that many UK workers did not want to fill- such as restaurant jobs and hard labour. But now the economy has failed, these workers are now wrongly blaming the migrants, when it is the government and the banks which should be blamed. So by creating new industry and thus new jobs we can alleviate the problems going on in communities.

Britain needs to be opened up. By this I mean that too many years of Conservative rule and neo-liberal politics has cut communities apart. People entranced with the capitalist dream are so encapsulated by the pursuit of bigger salaries and more things to fill their lives, they have forgot the importance of community. The problems in the UK, that Cameron condescendingly calls "broken Britain", aren't an excuse to up police powers and patronizing social policy but a call to fix the economic inequalities are so rife within British society. We must organise the economy to benefit not those who work in the City crunching numbers that have no meaning, but those who really contribute something to society; people who organise social groups for teenagers, who those who set up charities to help the disadvantaged in their community. By rewarding the people who do real good, people will see the benefits of helping out others, and it will be a chain reaction. By doing this we can also cut down the endless laws that do little to help the lives of most, and decentralise our political system, so it benefits people as much as possible. And the voting system is linked very closely to this. First-Past-The-Post is unrepresentative of general feeling across the country, and plays into the hands of lazy MPs who have had safe seats for years and years and years. By making the voting system more representative it will not only reduce people's apathy as they can see their role in the political system, but it will also challenge these lazy MPs to defend their seats and by involved with their constituents, rather than being a ghost in their constituency who only appears around election time for a few photograph opportunities. By making people feel part of the political system, they will feel a responsibility and take an interest in what is happening, and not just sit by and let things happen.

These are just my feelings on the issue at hand in Britain, but what do I know? The 3 political parties will endlessly talk about where cuts should be made, who is more progressive in social policy blah blah blah blah, but this whole party-bravado is just a distraction from the real issues at hand. There are honest, hard-working people out there, who aren't getting their just-rewards, and are becoming disenchanted with society, and we must help these people, and create a greater sense of community. But will they listen? Will they fuck.

Continue..

Filed Under: